Comparing 2001 to 2009 data

Comments

7 comments

  • Avatar
    jenny
    If you could tell us which county you are dealing with, we can look at our data and see if we can't sort this out. Thanks!
  • Avatar
    mbbell
    Pinal County 2001/2009
  • Avatar
    DougO
    Check your bridge of the 2001 Implan sectoring (509 sectors) to the 2009 Implan sectoring (440). My Pinal "General Merchandise" shows ~1200 jobs in 2001 and one job in "Bowling" in 2001.
  • Avatar
    mbbell
    Where can i download this "re-sectoring crosswalk"?
  • Avatar
    jenny
    All of our bridges can be found here: http://implan.com/v4/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=145&Itemid=7 The one you will be interested in is the IMPLAN 509 to IMPLAN 440 with Ratios.
  • Avatar
    mbbell
    i have the bridge and it seems to work except for: 508 Inventory valuation adjustment this has no location or place in the bridge. please advise
  • Avatar
    DougO
    It was defined away by the new benchmark I-O table. It was a change in OPI and has no employment or income associated with it. It was actually a change in the NIPA definitions for calculating GDP. Since it represents a change in asset value, it can not be considered a change in GDP resulting from economic activity. The net change in inventory valuation is now a transfer payment to or from capital.

Please sign in to leave a comment.